It is not unreasonable to consider that the results of these trials may provide a positive answer to the question: ‘Is it possible to improve brain development in DS?’.”
“In this work a series of nano-hydroxyapatite/poly(epsilon-caprolactone)-Pluronic-poly(epsilon-caprolactone) (n-HA/PCFC) nanocomposites has been prepared. Thermal properties of the nanocomposites are studied by thermogravimetry analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The TGA/DTG results reveal that thermal stability of n-HA/PCFC
nanocomposites is improved by incorporation of n-HA into polymer matrix, and the thermo-degradation temperature increased slightly with increasing HA loading. DSC results show that the glass transition temperature Selleckchem JIB-04 (T(g)) changed by the addition of n-HA. https://www.selleckchem.com/products/Acadesine.html The mechanical properties of the nanocomposites are investigated by tensile testing. The morphology for tensile-fractured surfaces of nanocomposites is observed by scanning electron microscopy. The effect of n-HA contents of nanocomposites
on tensile strength and morphology is also discussed. (C) Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2011″
“Objective: To examine the clinimetric properties and clinical applicability of published tools for ‘quantifying’ the degree of lateropulsion or pusher syndrome following stroke.\n\nData sources: Search through electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Science Citation Index) with the terms lateropulsion, pushing, pusher syndrome, validity, reliability, internal consistency, Angiogenesis inhibitor responsiveness, sensitivity, specificity,
posture and stroke. Databases were searched from their inception to October 2008.\n\nReview methods: Abstracts were selected by one author. A panel of experts then determined which should be included in this review. Five abstracts were reviewed and the panel agreed to omit one abstract because those authors did not write a full manuscript. The panel critiqued manuscripts according to predetermined criteria about clinical and clinimetric properties.\n\nResults: Four manuscripts referencing three tools for examining lateropulsion were found. Validity and reliability data support the clinical use of the Scale for Contraversive Pushing, the Modified Scale for Contraversive Pushing and the Burke Lateropulsion Scale. The Scale for Contraversive Pushing has the most extensive testing of clinimetric properties. The other tools show promising preliminary evidence of clinical and research utility. More testing is needed with larger, more diverse samples.\n\nReviewers’ conclusions: The Scale for Contraversive Pushing, the Modified Scale for Contraversive Pushing and the Burke Lateropulsion Scale are reliable and valid measures with good clinical applicability. Larger, more varied samples should be used to better delineate responsiveness and other clinimetric properties of these examination tools.